BIOLOGICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF MURINE-TUMOR SPECIFIC TRANSPLANTATION ANTIGENS (ISOTACHOPHORESIS, IMMUNOGENICITY)

Tumor-specific transplantation antigens (TSTA) are individually distinct neoantigens expressed on the cells of chemically-induced neoplasms. TSTA are operationally defined by immunization of syngeneic mice against challenge with viable tumor cells. Immunization with cell surface or extracted TSTA induces specific resistance to transplanted tumor cells. The biological and biochemical nature of TSTA was investigated in the 3-methylcholanthrene-induced fibrosarcomas of female C3H/HeJ mice, MCA-F and MCA-D. Tumor cell suspensions were extracted by treatment with 3M KCl or 2.5% butanol solutions and the TSTA was partially purified by preparative isoelectric focusing. The isoelectric pH of TSTA purified from 3M KCl extracts was 5.8-6.0, and from butanol extracts was 6.4-6.6. Whereas immunization with 10('5) and 10('6) irradiated tumor cells induces complete rejection of tumor cell challenge over a two-fold-log dose range, immunization with ug quantities within a one-fold-log dose range of extracted TSTA induces only partial resistance to tumor challenge. Reduced immunogenicity of extracted TSTA is hypothesized to result from immunization of mice with insufficiently purified TSTA preparations. The hypothesis predicts that immunization with highly purified TSTA, free from interfering substances, induces complete rejection of tumor challenge over a broad dose range. To test the hypothesis preparative isotachophoresis (pITP) was used to purify TSTA from electrofocused TSTA fractions. Significant purification was achieved, as immunization with 15 pg to 1.5 ug (5 logs) of pITP-purified TSTA extracted from the MCA-F, or with 1 pg to 10 ng (4 logs) of TSTA from the MCA-D tumor induced specific resistance to tumor challenge. Despite 50,000 fold purification of TSTA, immunization induced partial, not complete, rejection of transplanted tumor cells. This suggests a clear dissociation of the immunogenicity and purification of extracted TSTA, indicating that the induction of partial immunity to tumor challenge is an intrinsic property of extracted TSTA.^

EFFICACY AND MECHANISM OF â-DEFENSIN2 FUSED ANTIGEN PROTEIN VACCINES

Vaccines which use the strategy of fusing adjuvant murine â-defensin2 (mBD2) to an antigen in order to elicit stronger anti-antigen immune responses are referred to as murine â-defensin2 (mBD2) vaccines. Previous studies have validated the potential of mBD2 vaccines, thus in this study we focus on increasing vaccine efficacy as well as mechanism elucidation. Initially, we demonstrate superior IFN-ã release levels by antigen specific effector T cells when antigen is crosspresented by dendritic cells (DC) which absorbed mBD2 vaccine (mBD2 fused antigen protein) over antigen alone. We move unto an in vivo model and note significant increases in the expansion of antigen specific class I T cells but not class II T cells when receiving mBD2 vaccine over antigen alone. Further, knowing mBD2’s link with CC chemokine receptor 6 (CCR6) and Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) we note that this enhanced class I T cell expansion is CCR6 independent but TLR4 dependent. With anti-tumor responses desired, we demonstrate in tumor protection experiments with mice, compelling tumor protection when combining adoptive T cell therapy and mBD2 vaccine immunization. We further note that mBD2 vaccines are not limited by the antigen and characterize a viable strategy for enhancing tumor antigen immunogenicity.

Immune responses against major histocompatibility complex and interleukin-2 gene transfected K1735 murine melanoma: Potential vaccines for the immunotherapy of cancer

Tumor specific immunity is mediated by cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) that recognize peptide antigen (Ag) in the context of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules and by helper T (Th) lymphocytes that recognize peptide Ag in the context of MHC class II molecules. The purpose of this study is (1) to induce or augment the immunogenicity of nonimmunogenic or weakly immunogenic tumors by genetic modification of tumor cells, and (2) to use these genetically altered cells in cancer immunotherapy. To study this, I transfected a highly tumorigenic murine melanoma cell line (K1735) that did not express constitutively either MHC class I or II molecules with syngeneic cloned MHC class I and/or class II genes, and then determined the tumorigenicity of transfected cells in normal C3H mice. K1735 transfectants expressing either $\rm K\sp{k}$ or $\rm A\sp{k}$ molecules alone produced tumors in normal C3H mice, whereas most transfectants that expressed both molecules were rejected in normal C3H mice but produced tumors in nude mice. The rejection of K1735 transfectants expressing $\rm K\sp{k}$ and $\rm A\sp{k}$ Ag in normal C3H mice required both $\rm CD4\sp+$ and $\rm CD8\sp+$ T cells. Interestingly, the $\rm A\sp{k}$ requirement can be substituted by IL-2 because transfection of $\rm K\sp{k}$-positive/A$\sp{\rm k}$-negative K1735 cells with the IL-2 gene also resulted in abrogation of tumorigenicity in normal C3H mice but not in nude mice. In addition, 1735 $(\rm I\sp+II\sp+)$ transfected cells can function as antigen presenting cells (APC) since they could process and present native hen egg lysozyme (HEL) to HEL specific T cell hybridomas. Furthermore, the transplantation immunity induced by K1735 transfectants expressing both $\rm K\sp{k}$ and $\rm A\sp{k}$ molecules completely cross-protected mice against challenge with $\rm K\sp{k}$-positive transfectants but weakly protected them against challenge with parental K1735 cells or $\rm A\sp{k}$-positive transfectants. Finally, I demonstrated that MHC $(\rm I\sp+II\sp+)$ or $\rm K\sp{k}$-positive/IL-2-positive cells can function as anti-cancer vaccines since they can abrogate the growth of established tumors and metastasis.^ In summary, my results indicate that expression of either MHC class I or II molecule alone is insufficient to cause the rejection of K1735 melanoma in syngeneic hosts and that both molecules are necessary. In addition, my data suggest that the failure of $\rm K\sp{k}$-positive K1735 cells to induce a primary tumor-rejection response in normal C3H mice may be due to their inability to induce the helper arm of the anti-tumor immune response. Finally, the ability of MHC $(\rm I\sp+II\sp+)$ or $\rm K\sp{k}$-positive/IL-2-positive cells to prevent growth of established tumors or metastasis suggests that these cell lines can serve as potential vaccines for the immunotherapy of cancer. (Abstract shortened by UMI.) ^

Deviation of the alloimmune response toward tolerance by chimeric class I MHC molecules

Class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules induce either accelerated rejection or prolonged survival of allografts, presumably because of the presence of immunogenic or tolerogenic epitopes, respectively. To explore the molecular basis of this phenomenon, three chimeric class I molecules were constructed by substituting the rat class I RT1.A$\sp{\rm a}$ sequences with the N-terminus of HLA-A2.1 (N$\sp{\rm HLA-A2.1}$-RT1.A$\sp{\rm a}$), the $\alpha\sb1$ helix (h) with $\rm\alpha\sb{1h}\sp{u}$ sequences ( ($\rm\alpha\sb{1h}\sp{u}$) -RT1.A$\sp{\rm a}$) or the entire $\alpha\sb2$ domain (d) with $\rm\alpha\sb{2d}\sp{u}$ sequences ( ($\rm\alpha\sb{2d}\sp{u}$) -RT1.A$\sp{\rm a}$). Wild type (WT) and chimeric cDNAs were sequenced prior to transfection into Buffalo (BUF; RT1$\sp{\rm b}$) hepatoma cells. Stable transfectants were injected subcutaneously (s.c.) into different hosts 7 days prior to challenge with a heart allograft. In BUF hosts, chimeric ($\rm\alpha\sb{1h}\sp{u}$) -RT1.A$\sp{\rm a}$ accelerated the rejection of Wistar Furth (WF; RT1$\sp{\rm u}$) heart allografts, but had no effect on the survival of ACI (RT1$\sp{\rm a}$) grafts. In contrast, the ($\rm\alpha\sb{2d}\sp{u}$) -RT1.A$\sp{\rm a}$ (containing $\rm\alpha\sb{1d}\sp{a}$ sequences) immunized BUF recipients toward RT1$\sp{\rm a}$ grafts. In WF hosts, WT-RT1.A$\sp{\rm a}$ was a potent immunogen and accelerated ACI graft rejection, N$\sp{\rm HLA-A2.1}$-RT1.A$\sp{\rm a}$ was less effective and ($\rm\alpha\sb{\rm 1h}\sp{u}\rbrack$-RT1.A$\sp{\rm a}$ was not immunogenic. Thus, dominant and subdominant epitopes inducing in vivo sensitization to cardiac allografts are present in the $\alpha\sb1$ helix and the N-terminus, respectively. The failure of ($\rm\alpha\sb{2d}\sp{u}$) -RT1.A$\sp{\rm a}$ transfectants (containing recipient-type $\alpha\sb{\rm 2d}$ sequences) to sensitize WF hosts toward ACI (RT1$\sp{\rm a}$) grafts, despite the presence of donor-type immunogenic $\alpha\sb{\rm 1d}\sp{\rm a}$, suggests that "self-$\alpha\sb2$" sequences displayed on chimeric antigens interfere with immunogenicity. The ($\rm\alpha\sb{1h}\sp{u}$) -RT1.A$\sp{\rm a}$ transfectants injected s.c. prolonged the survival of WF (RT1$\sp{\rm u}$) hearts in ACI (RT1$\sp{\rm a}$) recipients. Furthermore, intra-portal injection of extracts from ($\rm\alpha\sb{1h}\sp{u}$) -RT1.A$\sp{\rm a}$, but not WT-RT1.A$\sp{\rm a}$ or RT1.A$\sp{\rm u}$, in conjunction with a brief cyclosporine course rendered ACI hosts permanently and specifically tolerant to donor-type WF cardiac allografts. Thus, immunodominant allodeterminants are present in the $\alpha\sb1$, but not the $\alpha\sb2$, domain of rat class I MHC molecules. Furthermore, the $\rm\alpha\sb{1h}\sp{u}$ immunogenic epitopes trigger tolerogenic responses when flanked by host-type N-terminal$\sp{\rm a}$ and $\rm\alpha\sb{2d}\sp{a}$ sequences. ^

{\it In vivo\/} induction of cytotoxic T lymphocytes against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 by synthetic viral peptides

Cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) play an important role in the suppression of initial viremia after acute infection with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), the causative agent of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). Most HIV-infected individuals attain a high titer of anti-HIV antibodies within weeks of infection; however this antibody-mediated immune response appears not to be protective. In addition, anti-HIV antibodies can be detrimental to the immune response to HIV through enhancement of infection and participating in autoimmune reactions as a result of HIV protein mimicry of self antigens. Thus induction and maintenance of a strong HIV-specific CTL immune response in the absence of anti-HIV antibodies has been proposed to be the most effective means of controlling of HIV infection. Immunization with synthetic peptides representing HIV-specific CTL epitopes provides a way to induce specific CTL responses, while avoiding stimulation of anti-HIV antibody. This dissertation examines the capacity of synthetic peptides from the V3 loop region of the gp120 envelope protein from several different strain of HIV-1 to induce HIV-specific, MHC-restricted CD8$\sp+$ CTL response in vivo in a mouse model. Seven synthetic peptides representative of sequences found throughout North America, Europe, and Central Africa have been shown to prime CTLs in vivo. In the case of the MN strain of HIV-1, a 13 amino acid sequence defining the epitope is most efficient for optimal induction of specific CTL, whereas eight to nine amino acid sequences that could define the epitope were not immunogenic. In addition, synthesis of peptides with specific amino acid substitutions that are important for either MHC binding or T cell receptor recognition resulted in peptides that exhibited increased immunogenicity and induced CTLs that displayed altered specificity. V3 loop peptides from HIV-1 MN, SC, and Z321 induced a CTL population that was broadly cross-reactive against strains of HIV-1 found throughout the world. This research confirms the potential efficacy of using synthetic peptides for in vivo immunization to induce HIV-specific CTL-mediated responses and provides a basis for further research into development of synthetic peptide-based vaccines. ^

A retrospective cohort study of the duration of hepatitis B vaccine immunity and associated factors in pediatric dialysis patients

Dialysis patients are at high risk for hepatitis B infection, which is a serious but preventable disease. Prevention strategies include the administration of the hepatitis B vaccine. Dialysis patients have been noted to have a poor immune response to the vaccine and lose immunity more rapidly. The long term immunogenicity of the hepatitis B vaccine has not been well defined in pediatric dialysis patients especially if administered during infancy as a routine childhood immunization.^ Purpose. The aim of this study was to determine the median duration of hepatitis B immunity and to study the effect of vaccination timing and other cofactors on the duration of hepatitis B immunity in pediatric dialysis patients.^ Methods. Duration of hepatitis B immunity was determined by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Comparison of stratified survival analysis was performed using log-rank analysis. Multivariate analysis by Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios for the effect of timing of vaccine administration and other covariates on the duration of hepatitis B immunity.^ Results. 193 patients (163 incident patients) had complete data available for analysis. Mean age was 11.2±5.8 years and mean ESRD duration was 59.3±97.8 months. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the total median overall duration of immunity (since the time of the primary vaccine series) was 112.7 months (95% CI: 96.6, 124.4), whereas the median overall duration of immunity for incident patients was 106.3 months (95% CI: 93.93, 124.44). Incident patients had a median dialysis duration of hepatitis B immunity equal to 37.1 months (95% CI: 24.16, 72.26). Multivariate adjusted analysis showed that there was a significant difference between patients based on the timing of hepatitis B vaccination administration (p<0.001). Patients immunized after the start of dialysis had a hazard ratio of 6.13 (2.87, 13.08) for loss of hepatitis B immunity compared to patients immunized as infants (p<0.001).^ Conclusion. This study confirms that patients immunized after dialysis onset have an overall shorter duration of hepatitis B immunity as measured by hepatitis B antibody titers and after the start of dialysis, protective antibody titer levels in pediatric dialysis patients wane rapidly compared to healthy children.^

Investigation of the mechanism of increased melanoma incidence in UV -irradiated mouse skin

The availability of transplantable, syngeneic murine melanomas made it possible to study the potential effects of UV radiation on the growth and progression of melanomas in an animal model. The purpose of my study was to determine how UV-irradiation increases the incidence of melanoma out-growth, when syngeneic melanoma cells are transplanted into a UV-irradiated site. Short term intermittent UVB exposure produces a transitory change in the mice which allows the increased outgrowth of melanoma cells injected into the UV-irradiated site. One possible mechanism is an immunomodulatory effect of UVR on the host. An alternative mechanism to account for the increased tumor incidence in the UV-irradiated site, is the release of inflammatory mediators from UV-irradiated epidermal cells. A third possibility is that UVR could induce the production and/or release of melanoma-specific growth factors resulting in increased melanoma outgrowth.^ My first step in distinguishing among these different possible mechanisms was to characterize further the conditions leading to increased development of melanoma cells in UV-irradiated mouse skin. Next, I attempted to determine which of the 3 proposed mechanisms was most likely. To do this, I defined the specificity of the effect by examining the growth of additional C3H tumorigenic cell lines in UV-irradiated skin. Second, I determined the immunogenicity of these tumor cell lines. The tumor cell lines exhibiting increased tumor incidence are restricted to those tumor cell lines which are immunogenic in normal C3H mice. Third, I determined the effect of UVR on melanoma development did not occur in immunosuppressed mice.^ Because of results from these three lines of investigation suggested that the effect was immunologically mediated, I then investigated whether specific immune reactions were affected by local UV irradiation. To accomplish this, I investigated the effect of UVR on cutaneous immune cells and on induction of contact hypersensitivity (CHS), and I also determined the effect of UVR on the development and the expression of systemic immunity against the melanoma cells. There is no clear cut relationship between the number of Langerhans or Thy1+ cells and the UV effect on tumor incidence. Furthermore, there was no suppression of CHS in the UV-irradiated mice. While the development of systemic immunity is significantly reduced, it appears to be sufficient to provide in vivo immunity to tumor challenge. However the elicitation of tumor immunity in immunized mice can be abrogated if tumor challenge occurs in the site of UV irradiation. This investigation provides new information on an effect of UVR on the elicitation of tumor immunity. Furthermore, it indicates that UV radiation can play a role in the development of melanoma other than just in the transformation of melanocytes. ^